Premier Cho Jung-tai has defended the executive branch's use of the countersignature power to block legislation, following criticism from U.S. scholar Kharis Templeman, who labeled the tactic unconstitutional. Since late 2025, the government has utilized this mechanism to halt eight bills passed by the opposition-led Legislature. Cho argued that Taiwan’s semi-presidential system necessitates this tool to maintain checks and balances, as the president lacks traditional veto authority. The debate highlights ongoing political friction, with some suggesting a no-confidence motion as a potential resolution, despite the associated risk of legislative dissolution. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court remains mired in internal disputes regarding quorum requirements and judicial legitimacy, complicating efforts to resolve these constitutional questions. The impasse reflects deep-seated tensions between the executive and legislative branches in Taiwan's current political landscape.
Source : Focus Taiwan
